Sonnets. Described by dictionary definitions as “a poem of fourteen lines using any of several formal rhyme schemes. In English, Sonnets typically have an ABABCDCDEFEFGG scheme, with every line skipping to rhyme until the final composition couplet.” Specifically Elizabethan poetry, the most common type of which would be that of the ol’boy himself, William Shakespeare. You’ll watch the teacher turn to some random page on a too-big-to-carry English Literature book and start with one of his classic sonnets. But, “What is a sonnet?” (you undoubtedly wonder). Well, to put it simply, a Sonnet is If that sounds overly specific and oddly stringent, well you’d be damned right. Every English student who’s had to drag their brain across such a concept has likely had to hear this at some point and forced to listen or read a sonnet. In order to avoid boring the audience to death, a performance is introduced by Catherine Tate involving the sonnet “My Mistress’s Eyes Are Nothing Like The Sun”. It follows the antics of a lower-class student engage in a conflict with their teacher and add to the meaning of Shakespeare’s poem.
Meet Lauren Cooper, a student of English descent going out of her way (as all troublemakers do) to start trouble. From mocking her new Scottish teacher’s heritage to randomly disrupting the topic and cutting him off mid-sentence, it’s a familiar sight to behold gor any viewer. Really adds to the feeling of English class, don’t it? After all, there’s nothing quite like a disruptive student attempting to upstart their new teacher to drive in the charm and meaning of Shakespeare’s poems, aye? After setting the scene, she ups the anty through a full performance of the poem “My Mistress’s Eyes Are Nothing Like The Sun,” to the bewilderment of her exasperated target. Now that we’ve established the context, why does it matter? What does this performance add to the piece? Simple, it transforms the meaning of the sonnet through the inclusion of class issues and varied interpretations of Shakespeare’s work to be more relatable to the average person outside academia. “Elaborate please.” Why sure, I’d love to!
First of all, “Lauren Cooper” over here is portrayed as the run-of-the-mill working-class student. Her opinion of poetry is reflected in the way she converses with her friend in the back of class calling English “well-dry” and saying “readings for losers!” This likely isn’t from a place of true hatred or distaste for the subject, but a reflection on the fact that the working classes have often been more busy trying to survive and not fall into poverty to care about such topics. Her parents likely only sent her to school so she could get a job that will provide for her in the future, something tangible and secure (think nurse, engineer, lawyer, etc.), instilling in her the idea that poetry and the arts were (at best) a hobby or (at worst) a waste of time. This adds meaning to Shakespeare’s sonnet as it enhances it through familiarity. The poem, itself, portrays the beauty in the ordinary of Shakespeare’s beloved Mistress through going against Aristocratic and frivolous comparisons that were common in love poems at that time. It told the tale of an ordinary, if not an unattractive looking woman, who despite not being as beautiful or lovely or otherworldly as songs, goddesses, or the sun still had a love so strong it pushed the poet to immortalize her in writing. Having a lower class member of society, people who Shakespeare would often write for (not just the rich!), helps add familiarity. It makes the audience feel more included than if an educated English professor or an upper-class student would have read it. It shows that anyone can relate to this poem and take joy in it.
Next, this performance adds a new interpretation to the poem that makes it more relatable to readers. Typically poems of this type are read like passionate love notes. Often they have gentle pauses, consistent tempo, or follow a particular rhythm that is slow and easy to follow. This is an academic interpretation, not something everyone understands. Not Miss Cooper’s. Her performance is more like someone singing rap/hip-hop lyrics from a song or a phrase they heard in a previous conversation. It is casual and already known, spoken with deliberate speed and expecting the audience to be able to follow. It takes the context outside of the distant and unfamiliar, but makes it tangible to all other forms. She does what many fail to do: she brings out the relatability of Shakespeare. Miss Cooper revitalizes the original purpose of Sonnets like this, the type that needed to be easy to memorize and applied to many circumstances. Now, the reader can see it in either a working class setting, as a student proving a teacher wrong, or a fun memory from class. This enhances the meaning of “My Mistress’s Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun” by making it memorable to the audience. By putting it like this, Cooper provides the poem a way to stick to the viewer’s mind and helps dismantle the intimidating, complex nature of a sonnet for viewers. Now whenever the sonnet comes to mind and they must think of this poem, they will remember her performance. This relatability helps make everything make so much more sense to those outside of academia and makes it more available to everyone. Something many writers can afford to do. Heck yeah for disruptive students!
Jojo C. Chukwueloka